![Matt Raible on Twitter: "I updated my Native Java Framework Comparison post to use Micronaut 3.2.4, Quarkus 2.6.1, and Spring Boot 2.6.2! Summary: Micronaut's memory usage improves, but startup time increases by ~ Matt Raible on Twitter: "I updated my Native Java Framework Comparison post to use Micronaut 3.2.4, Quarkus 2.6.1, and Spring Boot 2.6.2! Summary: Micronaut's memory usage improves, but startup time increases by ~](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FIR8r9aVcAAhyE7.jpg:large)
Matt Raible on Twitter: "I updated my Native Java Framework Comparison post to use Micronaut 3.2.4, Quarkus 2.6.1, and Spring Boot 2.6.2! Summary: Micronaut's memory usage improves, but startup time increases by ~
Matt Raible on Twitter: "I updated my native Java framework comparison to use Micronaut 3.0.1, Quarkus 2.2.2, and Spring Boot 2.5.4. Quarkus still wins the "startup time" metric, but Spring Boot wins
![Micronaut vs Quarkus vs Spring Boot Reactive Framework Deep Comparison | by Regupathi Thankaraj | Medium Micronaut vs Quarkus vs Spring Boot Reactive Framework Deep Comparison | by Regupathi Thankaraj | Medium](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:2000/1*ip9x40W6Pc8lULbb3MVOOw.png)
Micronaut vs Quarkus vs Spring Boot Reactive Framework Deep Comparison | by Regupathi Thankaraj | Medium
![Cold starts with SnapStart for Java Frameworks (Spring Boot vs Quarkus vs Micronaut) | by Artur Bartosik | AWS Tip Cold starts with SnapStart for Java Frameworks (Spring Boot vs Quarkus vs Micronaut) | by Artur Bartosik | AWS Tip](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:1000/1*CvYGdLsy-VVYmxPjbl15Zg.jpeg)